Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - ISESCO -
Home Director General Education Sciences Culture CPID Cooperation Secretariat of GC & EC

Notice

Chapter I
The Characteristics of Islamic Architecture

 

A/ The Beginnings of Architecture   

A/1- Art was created with the early creation of man. The Lascaux  and Altamira caves still bear witness to the  magnificent art displayed by the primitive man in adorning his cave, his home and settling place. These adornments, consisting of coloured representations of extinct animals, are evidence of a skilfulness and a realism that confirm the precedence of art as a means of communication  over language and literature in the life of humans.

A/2- With the advance of civilisation, the dwelling place became the receptacle of all artists skills and talents. The houses discovered in Wadi Annatuf (Palestine) and in Mouraybet (Syria), and which date back to the seventh  millennium B.C., were adorned with coloured decorations.

A/3- Construction itself, with its external appearance, its mass, and its components, was soon to become a "tangible artistic " entity requiring creativity and a technical spirit. It, however, remained the vessel for all plastic arts, including painting and sculpture. This was most evident in Islamic architecture as we have seen in Umayad Palaces that are adorned with coloured and monochrome sculptures, and with coloured sketches and mosaic work whose vestiges are still erect in the palaces of Al Hyr and Al Mshatta, and in the palaces of Al Mafjar, and Hammam Qusayr Amra.  

A/4- Although picturesque art separated from architecture to become associated with such mobile items as manuscripts, utensils, and furniture, its style did not alter very much. It remained either imitative  and realistic or ornamental and abstract, but it developed along with methods and with the efforts to innovate exerted up to date. Architecture, on the other hand, adopted instead of calligraphy and colour the language of mass and space, thus forging for itself an independent identity that remained distinct from the other arts of building that were contemporaneous with Islamic  architecture.

A/5- Plastic arts, including , painting and sculpture, could easily be incorporated with and inspired by other artistic currents and genres.  This is what happened to the art of miniature when it deviated toward European art. Architecture, however, cannot afford to deviate, no matter how slightly, lest its authenticity be lost or its characteristics obliterated under the hegemony of European architectural styles.  These might indeed be easier to implement, more practical, and closer to the very concept of modernity and fashion, but they still remain alien to the authentic civilisational origin of the Islamic architectural paradigm.  During periods of Arab political and social subordination, the melting away of Arab civilisational personality could be seen with most evidence in the vanishing of the authentic architectural character. The formation of an architectural style is a creative work that requires an independent society and environment. The subordination undergone by the Arab peoples succeeded in repressing artistic creativity and in keeping the door wide open for Western influence.  This is how the colonial style appeared in the buildings of Cairo, Alexandria, Algiers, Rabat, Casablanca, Aleppo, and Beirut.

A/6- When the new architecture under the name of Jugenstil first appeared in Germany, and when the world saw Germany’s glass and iron pavilion-built by Mies Van der Rohe at Barcelona’s 1929 Architectural Exhibition, it was the end of classical architecture and the beginning of the era of extremist and abstract creativity that was to be later consecrated by the Bauhaus School in Weimar.  It was the beginning of modernity in architecture, based on the rejection of all architectural traditions and the return to abstract forms and shapes. Hence the conversion of architecture to cubes and pyramids, either isolated or assembled in lots not totally free from some futility and derision. Architecture’s sole concern became to shock the beholder with its asymmetric volumes, masses, and spaces, and with a lushness in the use of internal spaces for special purposes, all dictated by the requirements of electric and electronic appliances that ensure motion, ascension, heating, ventilation, and safety. 

The question we might ask today is: how do modern constructions compare with those of past days? Jencks, who proclaims a post-modernist architecture, says in this respect: " Of the art of building, only symbols have remained. This art has gone to the farthest point that separates it from history and from man ".

The architecture of the past in India, Mexico, Italy and the Arab world, and in many other parts of the world, is still standing erect, painfully watching the collapse of its original concept on behalf of the abstraction and futility of modern architecture. But authenticity partisans in all architecture schools have gradually started combating the modern style by voicing their discontent and their disappointment with the outcome of modernity. For them, modernity has reached point zero (1).

 

B/ Construction and Architecture

B/1- Before any endeavour to study Islamic architecture, there should first be some agreement on the preliminary concepts of that art. There  might be some confusion between the concept of construction and that of architecture, although there exists a distinct academic specialisation for each: a technical-architectural specialisation, and an artistic-architectural one. Construction would thus be a building method performed to fulfil a specific social function like housing, worship, study, medication, and commemoration.  As such, this method requires knowledge of the characteristics of these functions and of their relation to the environment.  It also requires knowledge of the building materials most fit to fulfil the desired function in all safety, as well as knowledge of overall town planning in such a way as to have the construction achieved fit in the general tissue of the city.  As for architecture, or the art of building, it is an inventive and ornamental creation that serves to highlight the identity of the constructed entity and its function.  Architecture has a double-fold vocation: an external one, linked to the overall outlook of the city and devoted to making the construction achieved integrate well into the rest of the constructed landscape. The architectural style is then what defines the general outlook of constructions.  As such, it can either be authentic or alien, traditional or original. Architectural designers always endeavour to set up an architectural system to underlie the founding of any city, a system that would help organise social life and create united social relations reflecting the unity of the architectural style or  model.

B/2-The internal vocation or aspect of architecture, on the other hand, is linked to special individual or family interests.  Its mission is to fulfil direct objectives of the inhabitants who aspire to a private peaceful and pleasant world.  Islamic architecture has been quite unique in favouring the internal aspect of buildings over the external one.  This is how the interior of buildings became adorned with the most magnificent decorations on walls, lintels, friezes, columns, windows and doors. Inside the buildings, there were ponds, fountains, and gardens full of the fragrance of flowers and jasmine, and heavy with lemon trees and grape-vines, so much so that the house was said to be its owner’s Paradise.  A Hadith of the Prophet even says that " a man’s Paradise is his own house ".

B/3- The architect’s main concern was to design the shape and components of the building, namely columns, arches, cupolas, and vaults.  The art of building developed with the evolution of social life and with the development of new urban systems. The appearance of concrete, metal, and glass had had the greatest impact on the evolution of modern architecture that filtered into our own architecture.  It became, then, necessary to use them in conformity with the characteristics of the traditional architectural spirit in order to preserve the authentic architectural identity of Islamic buildings.

 

C/ The Terminology of Islamic Architecture

C/1- Islamic architectural culture started with the simple mason who undertook to create and invent in a very spontaneous way, relying on his intuition, skill, and on his social and religious belonging.  That mason never studied any theoretical references.  Rather, his endeavours and experiments set the path for a tradition that was to be followed by later generations of architects. Out of these architectural practices a special language and vocabulary emerged and was used by masons to describe their work . The vocabulary  was as dense and diverse as the masters profiles, their environments, and their personal dialects.  This is why different and non-unified  terms appeared, although they were all very pertinent and highly expressive.

C/2- With the diffusion of culture and the shifting from different dialects to Arabic, the common language of the Qur’an, it became necessary to unify the vocabulary.  Language academies started working to that effect, and it became possible for architecture institutes to adopt the terminology agreed upon.  These efforts made it easier to apprehend the secrets of architecture and unify architects’ reading of it, with the ultimate objective of reinforcing the unity of the Islamic architectural character.

 

D/ The  Characteristics of Islamic Architecture

D/1- Despite the difference between the concept of construction and that of architecture, Islamic architecture enjoys general characteristics relying both on the technical-scientific and on the artistic-creative principles of architecture. The theory of architecture was exhaustively studied in Egypt, Iraq, India, and in the West. The richly documented treatises on the subject, which served as a reference for experts throughout the world and which were transmitted to us through translation, were, however, very poor on the theoretical level and could not provide a theoretical background to help determine the characteristics of Islamic architecture.  It was, therefore, necessary to make up for that lack with a certain number of  facts.                              

D/2- It must be clearly understood that the definition of the characteristics was not done prior to the birth of architecture itself. This conclusion was inferred from what architecture itself revealed. There is a particular characteristic which underlied the features and identity of this art: religion. The Religious manifested itself in the Islamic aesthetic spirit that was at the basis of Islamic arts and architecture

D/3- The relationship between architecture and the Islamic creed found its expression in the monotheist spirit as a religious foundation, and in the very Islamic precepts, principles, and traditions.

Monotheist thinking is based on the belief in the oneness, uniqueness, and absolute nature of God (Surat al Ikhlass), and in  His sovereignty over Earth and Heaven.  As such, the concept of God in Islam is distinguished from the same concept in other religions where God is either personified, defined, likened, or relativised.  The absolute nature of God has been behind the relentless quest for the dimensions of that Absolute.  Faith has been a cultural pursuit that could be best expressed in the search for the secrets of the Absolute and for His tremendous powers as they are manifested in beings and in nature.  

D/4- The mosque was the first building to have been founded on the basis of piety.  It united the faithful under the same dome in awe before the Majesty of the Absolute, aspiring all, secretly and publicly, to get closer to Him.  The mosque was built to fulfil the requirements of prayer. Later on, the requirements of other faith-related practices shifted to other constructions like the school, the mausoleum, the palace, and the house

D/5- For Azzarkachi(2), who elaborated on the conditions underlying the construction of the mosque, the main objective of the edifice is to facilitate the worshipper’s carrying out of  his prayer and to allow him to hear the preacher with clarity.  The mosque should also fulfil the following conditions:

1- Allow contact between worshippers and the forming of orderly, aligned rows.

2- The absence of  columns from the courtyard, in order not to cut the rows.

3- The absence of any obstacles to the orderly alignment of rows.

4- The presence of an exit in the wall to separate the courtyard  from the sanctuary.

5- Access to the courtyard should not be direct.

D/6- In his Hadai’q Attamam fi-l-Kalam‘Ani-l-Hammam, a treatise on the architecture of public baths, Al Kawkabani talks about the necessity for these buildings to fulfil the adequate conditions of hygiene, privacy, and health.  Baths should have a therapeutic vocation, ensure the provision of services through an administrative platform, provide a changing room, a store room, and a safe to bath users. Al Kawkabani also recommends the improvement of the technical principles of the baths’ architecture with the increase of water-drains and light-shafts in rooms. The bath should also be divided into three parts of different temperatures: a cool part, a warm part, and a dry one to protect users from the effects of the sudden changes in temperature.

D/7- The criteria for the construction of hospitals were set by Religious Endowments  (Waqf) Conditions and market orders.

D/8- In addition to the general conditions set for the construction of buildings, there were other conditions that had to be fulfilled prior to the process of construction itself. ‘Umar Ibn Al Khattab, the second Muslim caliph, was the first to establish a set of prerequisites to construction. These are, as Ibn Arrami lists them in his book (3): the determination of the use to be made of the land or serviceableness, and the right to use the road. Geography books and travelogues, mainly AL Azraki’s History of Mecca, Ibn Assakir’s History of Damascus, and AL Khatib Al Baghdadi’s History of Baghdad, talk about conditions pertaining to town planning in general. In his Mawa’iz Al I’tibar, for instance, Al Maqrizi gives an exhaustive description of Cairo’s general planning, with its mosques, gardens, saints’ shrines, hospitals, baths, and lanes. Al Maqrizi’s treatise is considered the most important reference for town planning in general and for the description of Cairo more specifically(4).

 

E/ The Human Scale

E/1- Ibn Qutayba had compared the house to a shirt, saying that just as the shirt should fit its owner, the house too should suit its dweller. Ibn Qutayba was thus the first person to have talked about the human scale in Islamic architecture (5).

E/2- The human scale was highlighted by contrast to the mathematical scale that has been at the basis of Western architecture since the Greek and Roman eras and up to the modern times. The mathematical scale is based on the complete compliance with Order. Order forms out of the interaction of geometric and mathematical elements, and develops through specific tools like rulers and compasses. Islamic architecture is, on the contrary, based on the organic relationship between people’s needs and their social and climatic environments, and their beliefs and ideals. The architect’s tools are his arms, hands, fingers, and a chord to measure the distance and diameter of the arches, cupolas, and vaults he erects, and to check whether surfaces are vertical. His guide in designing, building, and decorating is not reason alone, but intuition too.  Construction is intimately linked to the inhabitants’ family concerns and social needs. It has to satisfy their mental disposition and suit their aptness to interact with their environment. The Qur’an  itself is very clear in stressing the centrality of Man in life in general and in his own environment  more specifically (Surat Annahl-12).               

E/3- The human scale in Islamic architecture was consistent with the environment of inhabitants, their traditions, and the spirit of Islamic civilisation. This is why transposing this scale to an alien environment would be very difficult, just as it would be difficult to adopt the mathematical scale to analyse and study Islamic architecture. The dwelling place has been created to be its owner’s home within his historical background, his beliefs, culture, and civilisation.

E/4- Saying that Islamic architecture was based on the human scale does not mean that it obeyed no scientific logic or mathematical reasoning. Muslims had a great share in the elaboration of architecture’s basic mathematical rules. Al Khawarizmi was the first to invent figures and rank them by degree. He also invented the zero and laid the foundation of Algorithms, the mathematical branch that was named after him. And he is the author of a book on Algebra and Equivalence where the basic algebraic equations are expounded. Still in mathematics, the Egyptian Abou Kamil Chujaa’ Ibn Aslam (d.240 AH /951 AD) had succeeded in solving equations with five unknowns. Another mathematician, Thabit Ibn Qurrah, had devoted his research to cubic and square volumes, while the sons of Mussa Ibn Shakir had solved the problem of the division of angles into three in a book about the surface of geometric forms. The said book was translated into Latin as How the West Learnt from Ibn Shakir. 

Ibn Al Haytham, on his part, was known for his dedication to complex geometric problems, among which : "if a straight line cuts through two straight lines and the total of both angles on the same side is less than two right angles, then the two straight lines, if they stretch ad infinitum, will meet on the opposite direction of the two angles that are less than the two right angles". 

E/5- The objective of the human scale underlying Islamic architecture was the protection of man from nature’s hazards, and from atmospheric noise and pollution. The Muslim architect had, indeed, succeeded in moulding architecture to make it meet that objective. 

The most important element in the Islamic house is the inner yard, and in the mosque the courtyard. The yard is that part of the building that opens directly onto the sky, while the doors and windows of the two storeys give onto it.  The yard is protected from any external air currents because separated from the front door by a curved corridor that also serves to check the infiltration of wind, smoke, or dust to the inside. Experience proved that the upper air currents remain hovering over the yard and only traverse it if the corridor and front door are both open. This means that the upper air currents, whether they be hot or cool, clean or polluted, exert no influence on the temperature or purity of the yard’s atmosphere.

E/6- The ground floor in rooms and in sanctuaries has to be higher than the yard’s or the courtyard’s levels. The rationale behind this rule is that, cold air being heavier than warm air, it is bound to remain at the bottom of the yard, and is prevented from getting into the rooms or the sanctuary by the high doorsteps. This system can be seen with more clarity in rooms whose ground floor is raised to the height of one tribune (Tasar) or two above the building’s ground level. This extra height prevents cold air from reaching the floor of the tribune.

E/7- The mason has always worked stones, bricks, and wood in dimensions that guaranteed the protection of inhabitants from the external cold and heat. 

E/8- In all kinds of buildings, water was a central element for cleaning, refreshing, and enjoyment as it used to gush forth from springs and fountains into pools and ponds of different kinds and forms. The buildings were conceived to best attract the warmth of the sun and sunlight, and to avert the smoke of kitchens and the unpleasant smells from toilets.

E/9- Islamic architecture is characterised by a major feature that sets the interior aspect of buildings far above the exterior one. Any building, be it a mosque, a school, or a house, is conceived in that spirit; meaning that its external architecture is far less significant than its internal one. This can be seen in the early mosques like the Umayad Mosque in Damascus, the Mosque of ‘Uqba in Al Qayrawan, and the Mosque of Cordoba. The same phenomenon can generally be observed in houses and palaces. In houses, this characteristic responds to the inhabitant’s search for privacy. This is why the interior is enriched with the most magnificent decorations and furniture, while the façade is neglected, mainly out of modesty. This " internalisation " falls under the concept of the Human Scale.

E/10- The spread of cars as a major transportation means changed the architectural structure of the Islamic city and altered the overall aspect of buildings. The city turned into a set of constructions aligned along the roads, the city’s artery that feed its social and economic dealings.

Modern urban paradigm is based on the partitioning of buildings into separate parcels that overlook the roads or the surrounding gardens directly. This is how the interior lost its primacy on behalf of the exterior in the Islamic architectural system. The architect’s concern shifted to the façades and external gardens at the expense of the buildings’ inner architecture. Those sections of the house that used to open onto the clean and cool air of the yard became directly exposed to the polluted atmosphere of the outside protect the building from smoke, smell and noise and to the inquisitiveness of the neighbours. This announced the end of the sacredness of home.

On the whole, the new organisation which cars imposed reflected the organisation of the modern city itself. While architecture was the basis for the planning of cities, the layout of the modern city became what determines the form and nature of buildings. It also reflected the new social order. The role of family traditions in moulding the architecture of buildings receded before that of cars, which have become the determining factor in city planning and in the definition of social traditions.

 

F/ Islamic urban and architectural precepts

F/1- Islamic precepts, principles, and traditions have shaped and reinforced the personality and identity of architecture. All these principles and traditions, if compiled in a comprehensive study, would provide us with the complete theoretical background of Islamic architecture.  The first precepts were ordained by ‘Umar Ibn Al Khattab who had ordered the Wali of Kufa and Basra to observe strict dimensions in the laying of streets and lanes, and in the determination of the contiguity and height of houses. He had also instructed that houses should be turned toward the mosque and the Seat of the Emirate.  Philosophers and thinkers like Avicenna, Ibn Khaldun, and Ibn Qutayba had similarly developed important architectural principles. Religious scholars themselves had a role in enriching Islamic architecture theory, like Ibn Arrami (d. 376 AH) who presents in his Al ‘Ilan Fi Ahkam Al Bunyane major organisational and hygienic instructions. He also talks about architectural errors and their consequences, like the absence of an insulation system to protect the building from smoke, smell, noise, and heat. Ibn Arrami does not omit to insist on the supreme importance of the sacredness of the dwelling place, and recommends its protection from the indiscretion of neighbours and passers-by.

F/2- Islamic faith shaped Islamic architecture both on the artistic and technical planes, and gave it that uniform personality that has characterised it all through the ages. However, the diverse traditions, languages, and cultures of the peoples who converted to Islam throughout the world, from China in the east to the Atlantic, in the west, gave variety to the architectural enterprise, while sticking all to the principle of functionality. Greeks and Romans, for instance, had a standard style for all kinds of buildings, while Islamic architecture always strove to make the shape of the building fit its function. The architecture of the mosque is different from that of the school, the cemetery, the hospital, or the house, and it is very unlikely that the function of a building be mistaken from its architectural form. Rather, the value of a building is proportional to its capacity to fulfil the function set for it. A house is perfect when it carries out its mission; that of ensuring protection and peace. 

Ibn Qutayba equally expounds the conditions of the dwelling place, be it a tent or a construction, and lists some building styles like plaster coatings, abstract or vaulted houses, or houses with a wall erected in the middle to support the roof.  He also cites the names of the different parts and rooms of a house and their function, namely the bedroom, the awning, the roofed gallery, the courtyard, and the other facilities like the stable and the toilet. Ibn Qutayba also points out the importance of building materials in ensuring the safety and robustness of buildings (5).

F/3- One of the basic principles underlying Islamic architecture is the connection between constructions and the overall architectural structure of dwelling agglomerations. Geographers, travellers, and poets seldom dissociate architecture from its civilisational environment. Talking about this connectedness, the poet Asa’ad Tobba' says :

Our house is a real house unapproachable by foe

It is the best of houses, with vine, palm and all kinds of good trees galore

Our monuments are signs of our greatness, check them after us.

Al Mas’udi(6), on the other hand, talks about the conditions that should determine the choice of the sites fit for construction in the countryside. Al Hamadani (4) determines the conditions for urban constructions, citing Sana’a as an example, and recommends the harmonisation of buildings with their urban environment, in conformity with the requirements of urban architecture. He recommends most particularly the positioning of buildings in the direction of the wind, and the growing of vegetables both to provide inhabitants with fresh supplies of food and to soften the air. He gives further directives pertaining to the provisioning in water and the organisation of irrigation, and to building materials, techniques, measures, and distances. Al Hamadani also discusses the external characteristics of buildings. 

 

G/ Natural Ventilation

G/1- In many Islamic cities like Isphahan, Dubai, and Aleppo, the architectural plan has provided for a ventilation and cooling system called "Al Malqaf" (Badgir). This system consists in a tower that cuts through and rises above the houses, with edged windows opened up in its upper part and a conic partition in the middle. This tower serves to catch the outside air that flows through it towards the building’s rooms. Generally, a water pond is constructed in the vicinity of the house to refresh air beforehand.(7)

G/2- A simpler ventilation system used to be laid on terraces’ balustrades, consisting of horizontal openings that also served to catch air to refresh those who were still awake or those who were sleeping on the terrace.

G/3- Another ventilation system was discovered in some ancient buildings.  It is made up of pipes laid horizontally in such a way as to distribute air to the different rooms of the building. Latticework-plaited windows are also commonly used for catching the outside air.

G/4- " Al Malqaf " remains the ideal ventilation and cooling system used in Islamic buildings that are located in dry and warm environments. It is both economic and healthy, and we would better readapt it to our modern architecture, not out of  any aesthetic concern, as this is the case in Jabal ‘Ali in Dubai, but as an economic and healthy ventilation system.

 

H/ Architecture and Ornamentation

H/1- Ornamentation is one of the basic components of Islamic architecture.  It is true that the Mosque of the Prophet, the first Islamic edifice, was extremely simple and ascetic in the beginning.  It was a mere roofed gallery covered with palm leaves and standing on palm trunks, with no ornamentation whatsoever.  The reconstruction of the Mosque, which was undertaken on the order of Al Walid Ibn ‘Abd Al Malik and during the governance of Umar Ibn ‘Abdela’aziz, was based on new architectural principles where ornamentation and mosaic work occupied a central place, as this was the case for the Mosque of Damascus.  The French scholar Sauvaget has described its ornamentation in a book devoted to this Mosque (8).

H/2- Islamic architecture relies on design that conforms to Islamic architectural traditions, mainly the principle of function, and on the creation of vegetal and geometric ornamentation and beautiful calligraphic figures. In fact, ornamentation developed so much that they dominated design. The different stages of that development can be clearly seen in the Mosque of Cordoba which had been built in three phases. The first wing of the Mosque was erected by ‘Abdul Rahman Addakhil on the model of Al Aqsa Mosque and the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus. Then in 848 AD, ‘Abd Arrahmane II added a 26 meters’ deep wing which changed the outlook of the Mosque and enriched it. An extra wing was built to the southern part of the Mosque, in continuation of the first part and along the Mosque of ‘Abdul Rahman Addakhil. This last part was added by Al Hakam II, son of Abdul Rahman Annasser in 965 AD. This historical and architectural succession shows us the gradual development of ornamentation up to when it dominated Islamic architecture altogether.  The mihrab in the last section added by Al Hakam is, indeed, one of the most magnificently ornamented Islamic mihrabs, and the cupolas of that wing are the glory of Islamic ornamentation. A third addition was made alongside the mosque to the east by Al Hajib Al Mansur in 992.

The development of crownings, arcades, and cupolas are the best example of the contribution of ornamentation to the development of Islamic architecture.

H/3- The Arabesque, literally Arab Ornamentation, is one of the most outstanding expressions of Islamic artistic creativity. However, its preponderance in architecture, especially in the palaces of Alhambra in Granada, confined architecture itself to a decorative role.

H/4- The inscriptions that adorn the ceilings and friezes in Islamic buildings remain a basic component of architectural creativity. In addition to their aesthetic quality, the inscriptions are valuable records of Islamic architecture’s history. The oldest beautiful inscriptions to have ever adorned an Islamic edifice to date are those ornamenting the Dome of the Rock from the inside. They date the construction of the Mosque and consist, in part, of Qur'anic verses calligraphed in cursive, Kufi style, and paved with the same mosaic stones ornamenting the Dome. There seldom exist Islamic buildings devoid of decorative inscriptions, mostly Qur'anic verses, engraved on stone or wood, or worked in mosaic and ceramics. Generally, the last inscriptions to appear in an ornamented space make mention of the monuments erected by the founder of the site and his role in making architecture prosper. These inscriptions also give an account of the progress of Arab calligraphy from its birth to the stages of the Kufi style and the sprawling decorative style known as the Tulut. Other similarly beautiful traditional calligraphic styles, namely the picturesque and the chess-like, can be found in Persian, Mamluke, and Ottoman mosques.

 

I/ Unity and diversity in Islamic architecture

I/1- Unity is certainly one of the most outstanding characteristics of Islamic architecture. This unity reveals itself in religious buildings, in dwellings, and in all kinds of private and public edifices, whatever the place or the era. This unity remains a basic component of the identity of Islamic architecture. It is true that places of worship in Muslim China, for instance, have departed from that principle of unity. Throughout the Islamic world, however, from Indonesia to Morocco, the characteristic of unity is present despite the great variety of styles. Also, the religious buildings that were erected in Europe; in Paris, London, and Munich have preserved their Islamic identity. On the whole, the Islamic identity is most patent in those places where Islam was widespread and where Muslims were a majority.

I/2- The variety of architectural styles is evidence of the role of creativeness in enriching architectural design. It also denotes the consistency of architecture with its overall architectural, social, and cultural environments. Variety within unity is one of the distinguishing features of Islamic architecture that was to pave the way for a modern architecture, deeply rooted in authenticity, but with a strong disposition to develop, innovate, and create.

I/3- Islamic art, mainly architecture, is characterised by the variety of its styles and forms. This diversity is the result of Islamic authorities’ encouragement of contact with other cultures and styles. The artist’s and the architect’s freedom to create is, however, the most important factor underlying the abundance and variety of styles.

Islam has always called for responsible acts and responsibility, and has always encouraged embellishment at all levels. Beauty and perfection go together in Islam. The basic principles that determine Islamic values are clearly laid down in the Book (3 Surats, p 15). God entrusted man with the regency of the world (Al Ahzab 33). This holy verse reveals the weight of the responsibility incumbent on man, but also the scope of the freedom and free-will granted to him. Man’s responsibility on earth is stronger and greater that heaven, earth, and the mountains together. This tremendous potential man enjoys had to be translated into fruitful and creative action in life. The faithful Muslim who shouldered this responsibility succeeded in building the most magnificent human civilisation ever created up to the present day. Encouraged by the freedom granted to him, prodded by the faith in God, and oblivious to the difficulty of his mission, man was unjust towards himself, ignorant of the importance of his sacrifice. 

The mission of constructing a civilisation had to be expressed through scholarly endeavour, religious erudition, and artistic creativeness. The Muslim creator had to draw the principles of his creation from the precepts of the Qur’an first. These precepts granted him a great freedom, but within the confines of responsible action. After the Qur’an, the creator had to refer himself to the needs of people, which varied according to their social standing, tastes, and talents. The keen rivalry between the successive rulers in different Muslim societies for the promotion of architecture and the arts, for the public welfare, and the personal artistic aspirations of individuals as to their security and well-being provided the creator with boundless opportunities to create within the framework of one Islamic aesthetic paradigm. This is how diversity in Islamic artistic creation has always expressed itself within the founding principle of unity.

I/4- To have an accurate idea of the large scope of variety in Islamic art and architecture, we must draw a comparison with other civilisations’ contributions in art and architecture too. Greek and Roman classical architecture, for instance, never went beyond the Ionic, the Corinthian, and the doric styles. Despite this diversity of names, all these styles follow the same architectural system consisting of a cephalophorus and an entablature. The entablature is constituted of a fronton that rests on a cornice and a frieze, while the cephalophorus is made up of columns similar in everything except for the shape of the crowns.  Similarly, if we look into Christian Byzantine Romanesque and Gothic architectural styles, we realise that neither  transcends the concept of the Roman basilica, were it not for the additional statutes in Gothic architecture and the painted glass and murals work in Byzantine architecture.

I/5- Such limitations do not exist in Islamic architecture. The great variety of ornaments and calligraphic styles testify to the boundless creative talents of the Muslim artist. Further evidence of this richness is given by the imposing monuments in Acra, Isphahan, Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo, Al Qairawuan, and Cordoba, which all span fifteen centuries of the history of Islamic civilisation.

This richness cannot be imputed to the diversity of rulers or dynasties alone.  The artist himself is the maker of these masterpieces and not the king, nor the owner of the masterpiece, whatever it is. These might sponsor creation or encourage it, but this only confirms that the variety of artistic and architectural styles is the work of the artist alone, of his personal vision, effort and skill.  Thus, the "individualism" which has become the distinguishing feature of modern creativeness has always been a trait of creation throughout all Islamic eras.   

 

 
Untitled Document